MLS Stays Course: No Fall/Spring Schedule Shift Before 2027
Major League Soccer (MLS) has officially confirmed it will retain its traditional March-to-December calendar until at least 2027, postponing any potential transition to a fall/spring schedule. The decision, announced after league meetings this week, reaffirms MLS’s commitment to its current structure despite growing debates about alignment with global soccer leagues. This move raises questions about the league’s long-term strategy and its ability to balance domestic priorities with international trends.
Why MLS Is Resisting the Global Calendar Trend
While most top-tier soccer leagues worldwide operate on a fall/spring schedule, MLS has consistently bucked the trend. League officials cite several key reasons for maintaining the status quo:
- Weather concerns: Winter matches in northern markets like Toronto, Chicago, and Minneapolis pose logistical challenges
- Competition with NFL/NBA: Avoiding direct overlap with America’s most popular sports leagues
- Player development: Alignment with the CONCACAF Champions League and summer international tournaments
- Commercial considerations: Preserving lucrative summer stadium availability and sponsorship agreements
“The reality is our calendar works for our unique North American context,” said MLS Commissioner Don Garber in a statement. “While we continuously evaluate all options, we believe this schedule best serves our clubs, players, and fans at this stage of our evolution.”
The Growing Pressure for Change
Despite the league’s stance, pressure to align with global soccer’s standard calendar continues mounting. The 2026 World Cup, hosted across North America, has intensified discussions about MLS’s position in the international football ecosystem.
Dr. Sarah Thompson, a sports management professor at Georgetown University, notes: “There’s an undeniable tension here. MLS wants to maintain its North American identity while increasingly competing for global talent and attention. Every year they stay on this calendar creates more scheduling conflicts with international transfers and tournaments.”
Key statistics highlight the growing disconnect:
- 87% of FIFA’s 211 member associations use fall/spring leagues
- MLS’s current schedule overlaps with only 3 months of the European transfer windows
- Summer international tournaments force MLS teams to frequently play without star players
Club Perspectives: Divided Opinions on Schedule Change
Within MLS, opinions vary significantly about the ideal calendar structure. Southern clubs with warmer climates generally show more openness to change, while northern franchises remain cautious.
Atlanta United president Darren Eales commented: “We’re always evaluating what’s best for competitive reasons. The current calendar creates challenges when we’re trying to integrate new signings from Europe or participate in international competitions.”
Conversely, Minnesota United CEO Shari Ballard emphasized practical concerns: “Our fans can tell you about February games in subzero temperatures. Until we have solutions for winter matches in cold-weather cities, a full calendar shift seems unrealistic.”
Competitive Implications of the Decision
The schedule decision carries significant sporting consequences. MLS clubs competing in the CONCACAF Champions League (now Champions Cup) often enter the tournament less match-fit than opponents from fall/spring leagues. Additionally, the misalignment affects:
- Player acquisition strategies
- Loan opportunities to/from European clubs
- Pre-season preparation timelines
- International call-up coordination
Former USMNT player and current analyst Taylor Twellman observed: “This isn’t just about copying Europe. It’s about minimizing the competitive disadvantages our clubs face in international competitions and the transfer market.”
What Comes Next for MLS Calendar Discussions
While 2027 now serves as the next potential inflection point, several developments could influence future decisions:
- Expansion to 30+ teams may necessitate schedule adjustments
- Potential hosting of future FIFA Club World Cups
- Evolution of winter weather mitigation technologies
- Changes in domestic broadcasting contracts
The league has committed to forming a working group to study long-term calendar options, with recommendations expected by 2026. This timeline allows MLS to assess the impact of the 2026 World Cup and monitor developments in global soccer governance.
Balancing Local Identity With Global Ambitions
Ultimately, MLS’s calendar decision reflects the complex challenge of growing soccer in North America while navigating international expectations. As the league continues expanding its global footprint through initiatives like the Leagues Cup and high-profile international signings, the schedule debate will likely intensify.
For now, MLS appears committed to prioritizing domestic growth and operational stability over immediate alignment with global norms. However, as the sport continues evolving worldwide, the pressure to conform may eventually outweigh the benefits of maintaining a distinct calendar.
Fans and analysts alike will be watching closely to see how this decision impacts the league’s competitiveness, player movement, and international standing in the coming years. Those interested in deeper analysis can follow the MLS Calendar Review Committee’s public reports expected in 2025.
See more Highlights Daily
